CPU comparison (bogomips): Difference between revisions

From Wurst-Wasser.net
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
!Bogomips (each)
!Bogomips (each)
!Bogomips (sum)
!Bogomips (sum)
!Power consumption (idling)
!Power consumption (normal operation)
!Notes
!Notes
|-
|-
Line 16: Line 16:
|3394.02
|3394.02
|54304.32
|54304.32
|
|
|
|-
|-
Line 23: Line 24:
| 4992.67
| 4992.67
| 39941.36
| 39941.36
|
|
|
|-
|-
Line 30: Line 32:
| 5190.32
| 5190.32
|20761.28
|20761.28
|
|
|
|-
|-
Line 37: Line 40:
|4991.91
|4991.91
|9983.82
|9983.82
|
|
|
|-
|-
Line 58: Line 62:
|4788.74
|4788.74
|4788.74
|4788.74
|
|
|
|-
|-
Line 73: Line 78:
|44.80
|44.80
|179.2
|179.2
|
|Performance-to-power-consumption-ratio is pretty bad.
|Performance-to-power-consumption-ratio is pretty bad.
|-
|-

Revision as of 16:13, 23 January 2024



ℹ️ As read from /proc/cpuinfo.



ℹ️ You also might be interested in Glmark comparison.
Device CPU Cores Bogomips (each) Bogomips (sum) Power consumption (normal operation) Notes
Lenovo L14 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U with Radeon Graphics 16 3394.02 54304.32
Lenovo L15 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U with Radeon Graphics 8 4992.67 39941.36
Lenovo Thinkcentre M72e (MT-M 3267-AZ4) Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2120T CPU @ 2.60GHz 4 5190.32 20761.28
Lenovo Thinkcentre M72e (?) Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G645T @ 2.50GHz 2 4991.91 9983.82
Lenovo Thinkcentre M72e (MT-M 4004-K6G) Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G2020T @ 2.50GHz 2 4991.05 9982.1
Intel NUC5i3RYH '2016 (silver) Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-5010U CPU @ 2.10GHz 4 4192.17 16768.68
deep-thought VM (this website's host) Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4210R CPU @ 2.40GHz 1 4788.74 4788.74
Lenovo Thinkcentre M720q Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8400T CPU @ 1.70GHz 6 3401.56 20409.36 8W At just 8W power consumption in normal operation, that's a lot of computing power!
Raspberry Pi 3 ARMv7 Processor rev 4 (v7l) 4 44.80 179.2 Performance-to-power-consumption-ratio is pretty bad.
Dell Precision 3240 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz 16 5802.42 92838.72 Hell, yeah!

You might be interested in glmark comparison.